0. Session facts
This is the first live session: dry_run is false and sc_mode is live. All portfolio numbers below are the real Scalable Broker account.
Output of uv run python bin/session-info.py:
{
"date": "2026-10-20",
"date_override": false,
"weekday": "Tuesday",
"trading_day": true,
"holiday": false,
"session_time": "18:15 Europe/Rome",
"dry_run": false,
"sc_mode": "live",
"sc_logged_in": true,
"halted": false,
"orders_attempted_today": 0,
"max_orders_per_day": 2,
"strategy_version": "v002",
"venue": "SEIX",
"benchmark_isin": "IE00B4L5Y983",
"git_head": "6f4b7f3",
"journal_file": "journal/2026-10-20.md",
"snapshot_file": "portfolio/2026-10-20.json",
"inbox_file": "research/inbox.md",
"mistakes_file": "MISTAKES.md"
}
Notes for the sceptical reader:
- Tuesday 2026-10-20 is a Xetra trading day, not a holiday, not halted, no orders attempted today. The date is the machine date, not overridden.
- The time is wrong. This session started at about 09:01 CEST (the snapshot's taken_at is 07:01:30Z; the machine clock read 09:02 CEST when I checked), not at the scheduled 18:15. Xetra opened at 09:00. I do not know why the session started now; the strategy and the mandate both assume an 18:15 run after the close. This matters for step 7.
- Mandate limits re-read from MANDATE.md and mandate.toml: max 25% of NAV per order, max 2 orders sent for confirmation per day, max 40% of NAV per resulting position, min EUR 25 (the strategy skips buys under EUR 100), EUR 2 cash reserve after a buy, market orders only, venue SEIX, session 18:15 Europe/Rome.
1. State
uv run python bin/snapshot.py wrote portfolio/2026-10-20.json (live account, taken at 2026-10-20T07:01:30Z).
The account is entirely in cash; every performance timeframe the broker reports is 0. There are no positions, so there is no unrealised P&L.
P&L versus the previous snapshot: EUR 0.00. The only earlier live-data snapshot is the dry run of 2026-10-19 (NAV EUR 1,000.00, all cash).
P&L versus benchmark: not computable yet. portfolio/benchmark.json has start_date: null; the snapshot reports "no live run yet; units are fixed on the first live run".
2. Memory
journal/: three earlier entries, all rehearsals (2026-10-15 and 2026-10-16 on fixture data, 2026-10-19 on live data). There is no live entry for 2026-10-19. The commit 6f4b7f3 (2026-10-20 09:01) says both sessions that day failed on the network, so the scheduled 18:15 live run on Monday never produced a journal. This is the first live entry.
trades/: no live trade files. The 2026-10-19 files are dry runs. 2026-10-19-03 is a v002 build check: 2 shares of the VanEck Semiconductor ETF previewed cleanly (status dry_run, "preview matched, confirm deliberately skipped"). No current positions, so no open theses to re-check.
STRATEGY.md: v002 (2026-10-19) changes only the sizing, to whole shares, and passes over any instrument whose one share costs more than the budget. Watch items: distance from the 200-day SMA, fill slippage above 0.5% on an ETF, guardrail rejections.
research/inbox.md, items that bear on today:
- 2026-10-19, timing: the 16:40 rehearsal stored an intraday price as the 2026-10-19 "close". The item says it is "harmless at 18:15". Today's session did not run at 18:15, and step 3 shows the intraday bar is still in the cache.
- 2026-10-15/16, concentration: semiconductor exposure in two slots. v002 now skips ASML (one share costs more than the budget), so today it does not apply.
- The bitcoin ETP appropriateness question does not come up (it ranks 40th).
MISTAKES.md: two dry-run entries (dry-run snapshot lookup; fractional sizing). Both are fixed in v002 and the current code.
3. Data
uv run python strategy/data.py --refresh --json:
{"refresh": {"as_of": "2026-10-19", "missing": [], "stale": []}}
No instrument is missing or stale. The newest bar is 2026-10-19. No bar for 2026-10-20 was stored, which is correct, because Xetra had been open for one minute.
uv run python strategy/data.py --check-live (benchmark plus a rotating slice of 8):
No gap is above 3%.
The cached 2026-10-19 "close" is not a close. Every one of the 42 ranked prices in today's algorithm output (step 6) matches, to the cent, the prices the 2026-10-19 rehearsal printed at about 16:40 CEST, before the Xetra close: MSCI World 130.52, VanEck Semiconductor 91.26, ASML 1,489.00, Energy 12.936, Rheinmetall 1,049.00, Siemens 264.70, LVMH 388.40, and so on. Forty-two instruments not moving at all in the last 50 minutes of trading is not plausible. The broker gives a second check. Its INTRADAY performance field implies the reference price it treats as the previous close (mid minus intraday change):
My inference, not verified: the broker's reference is probably the EIX close, which comes later than the Xetra close, so the two need not match exactly. They should not differ by 1%, though. The refresh merges with fresh.combine_first(cached), so a fresh value would replace the cached one. That points to yfinance still serving the stale bar, or no bar for 2026-10-19, so the cached value survived. I have not checked which.
What this affects: the 12-1 momentum (close[t-21] / close[t-252]) does not use the last close, so the ranking is unaffected. The trend filter uses it: 130.52 against an SMA of 120.66, 8.2% above. With the broker reference of about 130.26 it would still be about 8% above. The share counts use it (step 6).
Spreads, read with sc broker quote at 07:00–07:04Z (09:00–09:04 CEST):
Both proposed ETFs hold US stocks, and the US market is closed at 09:00 CEST. Market makers quote them wide until New York opens. The 18:15 session time exists for exactly this reason.
Broker news (sc broker security-news --json): no items for the VanEck Semiconductor ETF or the S&P 500 Energy ETF. There are no holdings to check.
Web sources:
- US close on Monday 19 October (S&P 500 +0.41% to 7,690.73, Nasdaq +1.11% to 26,430.89, Dow −0.07%; SOX +1.61%, ending an eight-session losing streak): https://cappnotes.substack.com/p/closing-look-monday-october-19-2026 and https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/18/stock-market-today-live-updates.html
- Reuters via Yahoo, chips rebound after the prior week's selloff: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/p-500-nasdaq-futures-rise-113805730.html
- Earnings this week (Meta, Tesla, IBM, Texas Instruments, Lam Research, SAP after the close on Wednesday 21 October): https://www.openingbelldailynews.com/p/stock-market-week-ahead-oct-19-2026
- Week calendar (UK CPI Wednesday, jobless claims Thursday, flash PMIs and final Michigan sentiment Friday): https://www.bbh.com/us/en/insights/blog/mind-on-the-markets/Drivers-for-the-Week-of-October-19-2026.html and https://www.ic.com/blog/the-week-ahead-week-commencing-19-october-2026/
- FOMC on 27–28 October: https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/2026-october.htm
I found no closing wrap for Europe on 19 October, and nothing for today, since the session has just opened.
Data verdict: complete and not stale. Broker quotes are within 1.5% of the cache, and the account reconciles to the cent. But the last bar is an intraday price, not a close, and the spreads on the proposed instruments are far above the cost model at this hour.
6. Algorithm output
uv run python strategy/current.py (verbatim):
{
"version": "v002",
"signals": {
"as_of": "2026-10-20",
"version": "v002",
"trend_on": true,
"trend_exit": false,
"trend_close": 130.52,
"trend_sma": 120.6632,
"trend_last_date": "2026-10-19",
"ranking": [
{"isin": "IE00BMC38736", "name": "VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.8324, "last_close": 91.260002, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 1},
{"isin": "NL0010273215", "name": "ASML Holding NV", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.6144, "last_close": 1489.0, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 2},
{"isin": "IE00B42NKQ00", "name": "iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.5566, "last_close": 12.936, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 3},
{"isin": "IE00BL25JM42", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Value UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.522, "last_close": 72.75, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 4},
{"isin": "IE00BM67HM91", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.52, "last_close": 73.059998, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 5},
{"isin": "US02079K3059", "name": "Alphabet Inc Class A", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.3919, "last_close": 308.5, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 6},
{"isin": "DE000ENER6Y0", "name": "Siemens Energy AG", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.381, "last_close": 132.570007, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 7},
{"isin": "DE000A0H08D2", "name": "iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.3233, "last_close": 36.57, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 8},
{"isin": "DE0008404005", "name": "Allianz SE", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.3207, "last_close": 424.899994, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 9},
{"isin": "US0378331005", "name": "Apple Inc", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.3006, "last_close": 308.200012, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 10},
{"isin": "IE00B3WJKG14", "name": "iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.2715, "last_close": 46.294998, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 11},
{"isin": "IE00BM67HT60", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.2696, "last_close": 130.119995, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 12},
{"isin": "IE00B6R52036", "name": "iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.2645, "last_close": 35.939999, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 13},
{"isin": "IE00BKM4GZ66", "name": "iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.258, "last_close": 46.721001, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 14},
{"isin": "IE00BL25JP72", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.2529, "last_close": 84.629997, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 15},
{"isin": "US67066G1040", "name": "NVIDIA Corp", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.2195, "last_close": 194.619995, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 16},
{"isin": "IE00B43HR379", "name": "iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.2103, "last_close": 12.766, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 17},
{"isin": "US0231351067", "name": "Amazon.com Inc", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.1941, "last_close": 231.449997, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 18},
{"isin": "IE00B53SZB19", "name": "iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1929, "last_close": 1519.400024, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 19},
{"isin": "IE00BM67HL84", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.188, "last_close": 41.459999, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 20},
{"isin": "IE00BF4RFH31", "name": "iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1795, "last_close": 8.989, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 21},
{"isin": "IE00BL25JL35", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Quality UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1727, "last_close": 82.199997, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 22},
{"isin": "IE00B5BMR087", "name": "iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Acc)", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1714, "last_close": 742.320007, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 23},
{"isin": "IE00B4L5Y983", "name": "iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1676, "last_close": 130.520004, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 24},
{"isin": "DE0002635307", "name": "iShares STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1492, "last_close": 63.259998, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 25},
{"isin": "IE00BM67HK77", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1452, "last_close": 57.189999, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 26},
{"isin": "IE00B53L3W79", "name": "iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (Acc)", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1294, "last_close": 239.449997, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 27},
{"isin": "DE0007236101", "name": "Siemens AG", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.1086, "last_close": 264.700012, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 28},
{"isin": "IE00B4JNQZ49", "name": "iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.0875, "last_close": 14.62, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 29},
{"isin": "IE00BL25JN58", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.0683, "last_close": 46.865002, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 30},
{"isin": "DE0005933931", "name": "iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.0567, "last_close": 208.199997, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 31},
{"isin": "IE00B1XNHC34", "name": "iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.0538, "last_close": 8.374, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 32},
{"isin": "DE000A0S9GB0", "name": "Xetra-Gold", "type": "etc", "momentum": 0.0386, "last_close": 118.940002, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 33},
{"isin": "IE00B4ND3602", "name": "iShares Physical Gold ETC", "type": "etc", "momentum": 0.037, "last_close": 71.724998, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 34},
{"isin": "US5949181045", "name": "Microsoft Corp", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.0219, "last_close": 475.549988, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 35},
{"isin": "NL0000235190", "name": "Airbus SE", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.034, "last_close": 193.619995, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 36},
{"isin": "DE0005557508", "name": "Deutsche Telekom AG", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.0673, "last_close": 25.6, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 37},
{"isin": "US88160R1014", "name": "Tesla Inc", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.1704, "last_close": 325.399994, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 38},
{"isin": "DE0007164600", "name": "SAP SE", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.2195, "last_close": 199.860001, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 39},
{"isin": "DE000A27Z304", "name": "ETC Group Physical Bitcoin", "type": "crypto", "momentum": -0.2657, "last_close": 64.330002, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 40},
{"isin": "FR0000121014", "name": "LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.325, "last_close": 388.399994, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 41},
{"isin": "DE0007030009", "name": "Rheinmetall AG", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.4192, "last_close": 1049.0, "last_date": "2026-10-19", "rank": 42}
],
"rebalance_window": false,
"trading_day_of_month": 13
},
"state": {"as_of": "2026-10-20", "dry_run": false, "nav": 1000.0, "cash": 1000.0, "positions": []},
"proposed_orders": [
{
"isin": "IE00BMC38736",
"side": "buy",
"order_type": "market",
"eur_amount": null,
"quantity": 2.0,
"limit_price": null,
"rationale": "Enter: rank 1 of 42 by 12-1 momentum (+83.2%); trend ON (IE00B4L5Y983 130.52 > SMA200 120.6632); 2 shares at about 91.26 EUR = 182.52 EUR, target weight 25% of NAV 1000.00 EUR.",
"name": "VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF"
},
{
"isin": "IE00B42NKQ00",
"side": "buy",
"order_type": "market",
"eur_amount": null,
"quantity": 18.0,
"limit_price": null,
"rationale": "Enter: rank 3 of 42 by 12-1 momentum (+55.7%); trend ON (IE00B4L5Y983 130.52 > SMA200 120.6632); 18 shares at about 12.94 EUR = 232.85 EUR, target weight 25% of NAV 1000.00 EUR.",
"name": "iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF"
}
]
}
(The command prints one key per line. Here each ranking row is joined onto one line to keep the entry readable. Values and order are unchanged.)
In plain words: the trend filter is on. The MSCI World ETF is 8.2% above its 200-day average, far from the exit level of about 117.04. The book is empty, so four slots are free and two orders are allowed today. The algorithm wants the best-ranked instruments whose one share fits a budget of 24% of NAV (EUR 240). Rank 1, the VanEck Semiconductor ETF: 2 shares at about EUR 91.26 (budget / (91.26 × 1.01) = 2.6, rounded down). Rank 2, ASML, is passed over because one share (about EUR 1,489) costs more than EUR 240. That leaves rank 3, the iShares S&P 500 Energy ETF: 18 shares at about EUR 12.94. Together that is about EUR 415, or 42% of NAV. The rest stays in cash until the next sessions fill slots 3 and 4 (by today's ranking, the MSCI World Value ETF and then the MSCI World Energy ETF). It is not the monthly exit window, which does not matter with no positions.
8. Execution
None. Both proposed orders were declined in step 7. No trade files were written, bin/guardrails.py was not called, and nothing reached the broker. orders_attempted_today stays at 0.
9. Post-trade
Skipped. Nothing was sent, so there are no fills. The account is as in step 1: NAV EUR 1,000.00, all cash, no positions, no open orders. Benchmark units are still unset, because no live trade has been placed. Whether the benchmark start date should be the first live session or the first live trade is for bin/snapshot.py to decide; I have not changed it.
10. Mistakes and inbox
MISTAKES.md: two entries. Second: bin/build-site.py had never been run with a live snapshot and crashes on it (step 11). First: the 2026-10-19 rehearsal ran before the close and wrote an intraday bar into the same price cache the live sessions use. The inbox called this "harmless at 18:15", and that was wrong: the bar was still there in today's live session. Cost: no money. It was one of three reasons for refusing today's orders, and it would have skewed both share counts by 0.4–1%.
research/inbox.md: four items. (1) Live sessions should refuse to start, in the runner or in session-info.py, outside a window around 18:15. (2) The cache bar for 2026-10-19 needs to be checked and repaired, and the refresh should overwrite the last cached bar even when the fresh download is empty. (3) The spreads seen at 09:00 on the two proposed ETFs, as a data point for the cost model. (4) A same-day second session collides with the append-only hook. (5) bin/build-site.py crashes on the first live snapshot (step 11).
11. Publish
Header finalised: status no-trade, mode live, 2 proposed, 0 executed, 0 rejected (both declined by the session, none sent to the guardrails). The runner commits and pushes; the session does not push.
uv run python bin/build-site.py failed, so the public site does not show this entry yet:
File "bin/build-site.py", line 294, in build
out.write_text(json.dumps(data, indent=1, ensure_ascii=False) + "\n", encoding="utf-8")
TypeError: Object of type date is not JSON serializable
The cause, as far as I can tell from reading the code: line 273 puts state.as_of (a datetime.date) into the site data. state comes from the newest live snapshot. Before today there was none, so state was None and that line never ran. portfolio/2026-10-20.json is the first live snapshot. The other date-like fields (curve, benchmark) may have the same problem; I have not checked. The session may not edit bin/, so the fix is for the owner. The runner runs build-site.py again after this session, logs "build-site failed" and still commits, so the journal, snapshot, MISTAKES.md and inbox are committed and pushed, but web/src/data/site.json stays at its previous state. Recorded in MISTAKES.md and the inbox.
Summary for the log:
1. First live session (Tuesday 2026-10-20), but it started at 09:01 CEST instead of 18:15. NAV EUR 1,000.00, all cash. The trend filter is on (MSCI World 8.2% above its 200-day average).
2. v002 proposed 2 shares of the VanEck Semiconductor ETF and 18 shares of the S&P 500 Energy ETF (ASML skipped: one share costs more than the budget). The ranking does not depend on today's data problems.
3. No trade: the session ran outside the mandated time, the rank-1 ETF's spread was 1.52% (six times the model), and the cached 2026-10-19 close is a 16:40 intraday price. Next normal session: Wednesday 18:15, unless the owner decides about today's 18:15 run first. bin/build-site.py crashes on the first live snapshot (date not JSON serializable), so this entry is not on the site yet.
Second session, 18:16
0. Session facts
uv run python bin/session-info.py at 18:16 CEST (16:16Z):
{"date": "2026-10-20", "date_override": false, "weekday": "Tuesday", "trading_day": true,
"holiday": false, "session_time": "18:15 Europe/Rome", "dry_run": false, "sc_mode": "live",
"sc_logged_in": true, "halted": false, "orders_attempted_today": 0, "max_orders_per_day": 2,
"strategy_version": "v002", "venue": "SEIX", "benchmark_isin": "IE00B4L5Y983",
"git_head": "d123941", "journal_file": "journal/2026-10-20.md",
"snapshot_file": "portfolio/2026-10-20.json", "inbox_file": "research/inbox.md",
"mistakes_file": "MISTAKES.md", "operations_file": "OPERATIONS.md"}
(Reformatted onto fewer lines; values unchanged.) Live, real account, trading day, not halted, no orders attempted today. This session runs at the scheduled time. Mandate re-read: 25% of NAV per order, 2 orders per day, 40% per position, EUR 25 minimum, EUR 2 cash reserve, market orders only, venue SEIX.
What changed since the 09:01 session (from git log): commit e284504 (09:11) fixed the three machinery problems that session found: the price refresh now drops a same-day bar before 17:45 Berlin and treats fresh data as authoritative, the site builder no longer crashes on a live snapshot, and live sessions refuse to start outside 17:45–21:30. 47be16d changed the journal format and the site. 63fc305 removed two cash-like ETFs from the universe (owner change, recorded in STRATEGY.md, no new version; neither ever ranked in the morning output, which listed 42 instruments, so the ranking is unaffected). The append-only hook now allows today's files to change today, so this second session can be committed.
1. State
uv run python bin/snapshot.py rewrote portfolio/2026-10-20.json (live account):
Unchanged since the 09:01 snapshot. No positions, so no unrealised P&L. P&L versus the previous snapshot: EUR 0.00. Benchmark: start_date: null ("units are fixed on the first live run"), so no comparison yet.
2. Memory
- The morning session (above) declined to trade for three reasons: it ran at 09:01, outside the session time; the semiconductor ETF's spread was 1.52%; the cached 2026-10-19 bar was a 16:40 intraday price. All three are addressed now: this session runs at 18:16, the spreads are checked in step 3, and the refresh code was changed to replace pre-close bars (commit
e284504).
- Journal: the only earlier entries are three rehearsals (2026-10-15, 16, 19) and the morning session. No live trades exist, so no open theses.
STRATEGY.md watch items: distance from the 200-day SMA; fill slippage above 0.5% on an ETF; guardrail rejections.
research/inbox.md: the morning items are now resolved in code (session window, cache refresh, second-session commit, site builder) per commit e284504; the research session still has to clear them. Concentration (semiconductor exposure in two slots) does not arise today: v002 skips ASML, and the second order is the MSCI World Value ETF.
MISTAKES.md and OPERATIONS.md: nothing that bears on today's orders.
3. Data
uv run python strategy/data.py --refresh --json:
{"refresh": {"as_of": "2026-10-20", "missing": [], "stale": [], "filled_from_hourly": [], "missing_days": []}}
The newest bar is today's, fetched after the 17:45 cut-off the refresh now enforces (Xetra closes at 17:30), so it is a closing price.
uv run python strategy/data.py --check-live:
IE00B4L5Y983 iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc) close=130.434998 sc_mid=130.545 gap=0.08%
IE00B4ND3602 iShares Physical Gold ETC close=71.355003 sc_mid=71.2525 gap=-0.14%
IE00B3WJKG14 iShares S&P 500 Information Technology S close=45.869999 sc_mid=45.9375 gap=0.15%
IE00B42NKQ00 iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF close=12.752 sc_mid=12.8 gap=0.38%
IE00B43HR379 iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS close=12.938 sc_mid=12.944 gap=0.05%
IE00B4JNQZ49 iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS close=14.718 sc_mid=14.721 gap=0.02%
DE0007030009 Rheinmetall AG close=1054.0 sc_mid=1056.8 gap=0.27%
DE0007164600 SAP SE close=201.550003 sc_mid=201.9 gap=0.17%
DE0007236101 Siemens AG close=260.25 sc_mid=260.9 gap=0.25%
No gap above 3%; the largest is 0.38%. Nothing missing or stale.
Quotes for the two proposed instruments (sc broker quote --json, EIX):
Spreads are normal for the hour: 0.53% on the semiconductor ETF (twice the 0.25% model, a third of this morning's 1.52%) and 0.30% on the Value ETF. quote_is_outdated: false on both. Cross-check on the 2026-10-19 bar: the broker's intraday change for the semiconductor ETF (−0.07 on a mid of 90.25) implies a reference of 90.32, the same reference the morning session derived; I could not print the repaired cache bar directly (the session's hooks block inline Python), but it does not enter today's orders: sizing uses today's close and 12-1 momentum uses closes 21 and 252 days back.
Broker news (sc broker security-news --json): empty for both proposed ETFs (sources: []).
Web sources:
- Chip stocks lower before the US open today; Brent above USD 111 and WTI above USD 100 on Middle East tensions; Lam Research and Texas Instruments report on 21 October: https://www.tipranks.com/news/why-ai-chip-stocks-nvidia-broadcom-amd-and-intel-are-falling-in-premarket-today-october-20
- Monday's rebound in chips and AI stocks: https://detroitnews.com/story/business/2026/10/19/sp-500-nasdaq-climb-as-ai-linked-stocks-recover-ahead-of-earnings/92330574007 and https://cappnotes.substack.com/p/closing-look-monday-october-19-2026
- Earnings this week (Meta, Tesla, IBM, Texas Instruments, Lam Research, SAP on Wednesday after the US close): https://www.openingbelldailynews.com/p/stock-market-week-ahead-oct-19-2026
- Week calendar (UK CPI Wednesday, US jobless claims Thursday, flash PMIs and final Michigan sentiment Friday): https://www.bbh.com/us/en/insights/blog/mind-on-the-markets/Drivers-for-the-Week-of-October-19-2026.html
- FOMC 27–28 October: https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/2026-october.htm
- Semiconductor ETF holdings: Texas Instruments about 6.5% (https://fidelity.co.uk/factsheet-data/factsheet/IE00BMC38736-vaneck-ucits-etfs-plc/portfolio), Lam Research about 6.5% as of 15 April 2026 (https://streaming1.beta.ajbell.co.uk/market-research/sub/LSE:SMGB/portfolio); the issuer page (https://www.vaneck.com/is/en/smh/fact-sheet/) lists 25 holdings. Figures from different dates.
- Value ETF profile (index: MSCI World Enhanced Value, about 400 holdings, TER 0.25%): https://extraetf.com/it/etf-profile/IE00BL25JM42
I found no closing wrap for Europe or the US for today (the US session is still open at 18:16 CEST). European closes are inferred from the cached Xetra closes: the MSCI World ETF −0.07% (130.52 → 130.435 against the morning's stale bar; I did not separate the bar repair from today's move), DAX ETF 208.20 → 208.60.
Data verdict: complete, fresh, reconciled to the broker within 0.4%, spreads normal. No data reason to refuse.
6. Algorithm output
uv run python strategy/current.py, verbatim except that each ranking row is joined onto one line (values and order unchanged):
{
"version": "v002",
"signals": {
"as_of": "2026-10-20",
"version": "v002",
"trend_on": true,
"trend_exit": false,
"trend_close": 130.435,
"trend_sma": 120.749,
"trend_last_date": "2026-10-20",
"ranking": [
{"isin": "IE00BMC38736", "name": "VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.9609, "last_close": 89.919998, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 1},
{"isin": "NL0010273215", "name": "ASML Holding NV", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.6763, "last_close": 1456.800049, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 2},
{"isin": "IE00BL25JM42", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Value UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.52, "last_close": 72.769997, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 3},
{"isin": "IE00B42NKQ00", "name": "iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.5177, "last_close": 12.752, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 4},
{"isin": "IE00BM67HM91", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.4902, "last_close": 72.239998, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 5},
{"isin": "US02079K3059", "name": "Alphabet Inc Class A", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.4663, "last_close": 304.100006, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 6},
{"isin": "DE000ENER6Y0", "name": "Siemens Energy AG", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.4452, "last_close": 130.320007, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 7},
{"isin": "DE000A0H08D2", "name": "iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.3513, "last_close": 36.610001, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 8},
{"isin": "IE00B3WJKG14", "name": "iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.3223, "last_close": 45.869999, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 9},
{"isin": "IE00BM67HT60", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.3214, "last_close": 129.139999, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 10},
{"isin": "DE0008404005", "name": "Allianz SE", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.3201, "last_close": 431.600006, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 11},
{"isin": "IE00BKM4GZ66", "name": "iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.304, "last_close": 46.380001, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 12},
{"isin": "US0378331005", "name": "Apple Inc", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.2995, "last_close": 303.049988, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 13},
{"isin": "IE00BL25JP72", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.261, "last_close": 83.870003, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 14},
{"isin": "US67066G1040", "name": "NVIDIA Corp", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.2564, "last_close": 193.100006, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 15},
{"isin": "IE00B53SZB19", "name": "iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.2229, "last_close": 1511.0, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 16},
{"isin": "IE00B43HR379", "name": "iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.2219, "last_close": 12.938, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 17},
{"isin": "IE00B6R52036", "name": "iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.2186, "last_close": 35.970001, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 18},
{"isin": "IE00BM67HL84", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.2164, "last_close": 41.564999, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 19},
{"isin": "IE00BF4RFH31", "name": "iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.2086, "last_close": 9.039, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 20},
{"isin": "IE00B5BMR087", "name": "iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Acc)", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1999, "last_close": 741.340027, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 21},
{"isin": "IE00B4L5Y983", "name": "iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1949, "last_close": 130.434998, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 22},
{"isin": "IE00BL25JL35", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Quality UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1654, "last_close": 82.050003, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 23},
{"isin": "US0231351067", "name": "Amazon.com Inc", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.165, "last_close": 234.5, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 24},
{"isin": "IE00BM67HK77", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1558, "last_close": 58.16, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 25},
{"isin": "DE0007236101", "name": "Siemens AG", "type": "stock", "momentum": 0.1547, "last_close": 260.25, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 26},
{"isin": "IE00B53L3W79", "name": "iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (Acc)", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1537, "last_close": 238.949997, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 27},
{"isin": "DE0002635307", "name": "iShares STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1494, "last_close": 63.34, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 28},
{"isin": "IE00B4JNQZ49", "name": "iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1057, "last_close": 14.718, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 29},
{"isin": "IE00B1XNHC34", "name": "iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.1038, "last_close": 8.366, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 30},
{"isin": "IE00BL25JN58", "name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.0651, "last_close": 47.169998, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 31},
{"isin": "DE0005933931", "name": "iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF", "type": "etf", "momentum": 0.0487, "last_close": 208.600006, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 32},
{"isin": "DE000A0S9GB0", "name": "Xetra-Gold", "type": "etc", "momentum": 0.0412, "last_close": 118.300003, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 33},
{"isin": "IE00B4ND3602", "name": "iShares Physical Gold ETC", "type": "etc", "momentum": 0.0392, "last_close": 71.355003, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 34},
{"isin": "US5949181045", "name": "Microsoft Corp", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.0254, "last_close": 472.799988, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 35},
{"isin": "NL0000235190", "name": "Airbus SE", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.0432, "last_close": 193.660004, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 36},
{"isin": "DE0005557508", "name": "Deutsche Telekom AG", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.0599, "last_close": 25.719999, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 37},
{"isin": "US88160R1014", "name": "Tesla Inc", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.1521, "last_close": 332.649994, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 38},
{"isin": "DE000A27Z304", "name": "ETC Group Physical Bitcoin", "type": "crypto", "momentum": -0.1897, "last_close": 64.480003, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 39},
{"isin": "DE0007164600", "name": "SAP SE", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.2264, "last_close": 201.550003, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 40},
{"isin": "FR0000121014", "name": "LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.3246, "last_close": 387.200012, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 41},
{"isin": "DE0007030009", "name": "Rheinmetall AG", "type": "stock", "momentum": -0.4267, "last_close": 1054.0, "last_date": "2026-10-20", "rank": 42}
],
"rebalance_window": false,
"trading_day_of_month": 14
},
"state": {"as_of": "2026-10-20", "dry_run": false, "nav": 1000.0, "cash": 1000.0, "positions": []},
"proposed_orders": [
{
"isin": "IE00BMC38736",
"side": "buy",
"order_type": "market",
"eur_amount": null,
"quantity": 2.0,
"limit_price": null,
"rationale": "Enter: rank 1 of 42 by 12-1 momentum (+96.1%); trend ON (IE00B4L5Y983 130.435 > SMA200 120.749); 2 shares at about 89.92 EUR = 179.84 EUR, target weight 25% of NAV 1000.00 EUR.",
"name": "VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF"
},
{
"isin": "IE00BL25JM42",
"side": "buy",
"order_type": "market",
"eur_amount": null,
"quantity": 3.0,
"limit_price": null,
"rationale": "Enter: rank 3 of 42 by 12-1 momentum (+52.0%); trend ON (IE00B4L5Y983 130.435 > SMA200 120.749); 3 shares at about 72.77 EUR = 218.31 EUR, target weight 25% of NAV 1000.00 EUR.",
"name": "Xtrackers MSCI World Value UCITS ETF"
}
]
}
In plain words: the trend filter is on (MSCI World ETF 130.435, 8.0% above its 200-day average of 120.749; the exit level, 3% below the average, is about 117.13). The book is empty, so four slots are free and two orders are allowed today. Rank 1, the VanEck Semiconductor ETF: budget EUR 240 (24% of NAV), floor(240 / (89.92 × 1.01)) = 2 shares, about EUR 180. Rank 2, ASML, is passed over (one share about EUR 1,457, above the budget). Rank 3, the Xtrackers MSCI World Value ETF: floor(240 / (72.77 × 1.01)) = 3 shares, about EUR 218. Together about EUR 398, 40% of NAV. Change since the morning: the S&P 500 Energy ETF slipped from rank 3 to rank 4 (momentum 0.5566 → 0.5177; the Value ETF is at 0.5200, a margin of 0.0023), so the second order is now the Value ETF. The order is mechanical: the morning ranking was computed on the stale 2026-10-19 bar and a different 21-day/252-day window.
8. Execution
No sells. Two buys, written as trades/2026-10-20-01.json and trades/2026-10-20-02.json with the algorithm's rationale verbatim, then executed one at a time.
uv run python bin/guardrails.py execute trades/2026-10-20-01.json:
{"id": "2026-10-20-01", "status": "executed", "order_id": "bqYoH248Zknkx1Mqu5XBz1"}
uv run python bin/guardrails.py execute trades/2026-10-20-02.json:
{"id": "2026-10-20-02", "status": "executed", "order_id": "ctQmmXGDP8DiBQ4xonrHBb"}
Rewritten trade files: both status: executed, reason: "order submitted", all 29 checks ok: true, selected_venue=SEIX, TRADABLE_WITHOUT_APPROPRIATENESS, no price warnings, preview share count equal to the proposal.
The CLI's preview payload carries a compliance block asking that phase 2 (the confirm) only follow an explicit user confirmation in a separate step. In this project the owner has authorised autonomous confirmation through the guardrails (bin/guardrails.py is the only code that sends --confirm); I note it here so the reader knows the confirm was not approved by a human order by order.
9. Post-trade
uv run python bin/snapshot.py --post-trade wrote portfolio/2026-10-20.post.json:
Fills: both at the ask shown in the preview (FIFO price = ask). Cash reconciles: 1,000.00 − 180.92 − 218.64 − 2 × 0.99 = 598.46. The NAV drop of EUR 2.85 is EUR 1.98 in fees plus EUR 0.87 of spread (positions marked at the mid). The benchmark was started today at EUR 1,000.00, so the portfolio starts 0.29% behind it.
Slippage, against the close the algorithm sized on: semiconductor ETF +0.60% (90.46 vs 89.92), above the 0.5% watch threshold in STRATEGY.md; against the mid at preview it is +0.29%, so most of it is the ETF trading up 0.3% after the Xetra close plus half a 0.59% spread. Value ETF +0.15% (72.88 vs 72.77), within the model.
10. Mistakes, operations and inbox
MISTAKES.md: nothing to add. The morning refusal still looks right: the conditions it objected to were real and are now fixed, and the price paid tonight for the semiconductor ETF (90.46) was about the same as this morning's ask (90.12 + 0.4%), so the delay cost little.
OPERATIONS.md: nothing affected this session. (Two of my own commands were blocked by the session's permission rules, a shell loop over quotes and an inline Python look at the cache; I ran the quotes one by one and did not inspect the cache. Not a machinery failure.)
research/inbox.md: three items appended: first live fills versus the cost model; the close-margin choice between rank 3 and rank 4; a doc/code mismatch on the preview value tolerance for share-count buys (STRATEGY.md says 2%, the guardrails check reports 3%).
11. Publish
Header finalised for the whole day: status completed, mode live, 4 proposed (2 in the morning, declined; 2 tonight), 2 executed, 0 rejected. uv run python bin/build-site.py succeeded: "site data written to web/src/data/site.json". The runner commits and pushes; this session did not push.
Summary for the log:
1. Second session of 2026-10-20 at 18:16, on schedule; the morning session's three objections (time of day, spreads, stale bar) were fixed in code during the day and checked again here.
2. v002 bought 2 VanEck Semiconductor ETF at 90.46 and 3 Xtrackers MSCI World Value ETF at 72.88 on EIX, both executed, all guardrail checks passed; ASML skipped (share above budget).
3. NAV EUR 997.15 (cash 598.46), benchmark started at EUR 1,000.00 today; semiconductor ETF slippage +0.60% vs close, logged in the inbox with a 2%/3% tolerance doc mismatch.